“Russia’s efforts made it possible to slow down
global warming of the planet"
(Putin)
"Oh, frost, frost..."
(Russian folk song)
A man created for great things. He was given unique abilities and talents already upon his birth. Amazing adaptability to environmental conditions, getting used to the habitat and society of one’s own kind, accepting the rules of the game of this society and putting oneself within the framework of these rules, however, does not make the individual unfree. Even a slave, oppressed and powerless, is capable of dreaming and philosophizing. Of course, his thoughts will be primarily about survival and dreams of freedom, but the patrician also lives within the limits of acceptable rules, the violation of which is punished no less cruelly than the violation of the rules of a slave.
Born free, man enslaved himself, delegating powers to those chosen from among himself. Initially, being in harmony with nature, although completely dependent on it, since he himself was and is a part of it, man acted irrationally. He hastened to provide himself with comfort, and at the expense of other tribesmen, and created a hierarchy. The growth of the planet's population required the creation of conglomerations with different leaders representing their own paths of development. Thus, peoples and their individuality emerged. However, the development paths of different communities did not differ in diversity - all the same provision of the comfort of worldly existence.
This comfort could be achieved in several ways. For example, military conquests and the conquest of neighboring tribes. This is how the warriors appeared. The second option was trade, which is the most common speculation based on scarcity. What you see now existed before, and tricks (from body kit to creating demand) have always existed. Trade turned out to be a profitable business, but the problem was that the tribes of warriors did not agree with this approach and quickly realized that their comfort could well come at the expense of the traders. Milking a huckster became a matter of honor.
The third type of income was bank interest or a loan, which became widespread in Europe in the early Middle Ages. Banks became needed by everyone: warriors and merchants.
The fourth way to get rich turned out to be the hardest - work. Lived by labor greatest number people who created material wealth. It was they who were subject to tribute: first, tithes and a tax on human resources - recruits for the needs of soldiers.
The fifth option was the opportunity to make money from religion. This is the most productive income, taxing everyone and everything, that is, the four previous classes. This was especially evident in the Middle Ages. Now religion component bank interest and the Vatican Bank are evidence of this. I would like to clarify one detail, we are talking specifically about religion, and not about FAITH. Faith is completely different from the options for its interpretation.
And finally, the sixth way to make money in human society. This is the most unscrupulous one, because it exploits all the previous ones. It's about politics.
This is the method we will consider in relation to the annexation of the long-suffering Crimea to the Russian Federation.
I have heard rumors about telephone conversations between the Kremlin and Kiev immediately before the annexation of Crimea. I was always skeptical about this if it weren't for the document I published in the thumbnail title.
SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
ON THE LEGAL ASSESSMENT OF THE DECISIONS OF THE HIGHEST BODIES OF STATE AUTHORITY OF THE RSFSR ON CHANGING THE STATUS OF CRIMEA, ADOPTED IN 1954
The Supreme Council Russian Federation decides:
1. The resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Council of the RSFSR of February 5, 1954 “On the transfer of the Crimean region from the RSFSR to the Ukrainian SSR” as adopted in violation of the Constitution (Basic Law) of the RSFSR and the legislative procedure is recognized as having no legal force from the moment of adoption.
2. In view of the constitution of the subsequent legislation of the RSFSR this fact and the conclusion between Ukraine and Russia of a bilateral agreement dated November 19, 1990, in which the parties renounce territorial claims, and consolidation of this principle in treaties and agreements between the CIS states, consider it necessary to resolve the issue of Crimea through interstate negotiations between Russia and Ukraine with the participation of Crimea and on the basis of the will of its population.
Chairman of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation
R. I. Khasbulatov
Moscow, House of Soviets of Russia
May 21, 1992
No. 2809-I
Apparently, it was this document that the GDP had in mind when it said that Ukraine did not secede quite correctly.
While the Kremlin has taken many positive steps, some actions are puzzling. Of course, we are not allowed to know much, but sooner or later everything secret becomes clear. Is it worth keeping your people in the dark if there are documents that can explain the legality of the return of Crimea, and not just one, but several? The published Resolution should be of interest to historians, not only future ones, but also present ones. It seems to me that the Kremlin could not have been unaware of the existence of such a document, otherwise why would there be such a huge staff of lawyers there.
As I see it from what I’ve read, the decision to return Crimea was made by both sides, and this document only confirms the legality of what happened in 2014. It turns out that there was nothing heroic in the return of the peninsula, except for the deceived people who took everything at face value. It seems that this document also sheds light on Russia’s trampling in the Donbass.
In this light, the statement of another European official is extremely noteworthy.
The International Criminal Court in The Hague cannot open a criminal case regarding the annexation of Crimea to the Russian Federation. This was stated by ICC spokesman Fadi El-Abdallah.
According to him, the function of considering cases related to “acts of aggression” may appear at the International Criminal Court only at the end of 2017, if the relevant norms are ratified by at least 30 states.
“This norm is written in the Rome Statute, but will come into force in 2017. There will be a vote in November 2017 on whether we want to activate this part of the judicial responsibility or not. Depending on the results of the vote, we will know whether this crime falls within the jurisdiction of the court,” Abdallah said.
However, according to him, Ukraine will not be able to appeal to the ICC even after the completion of the procedure. “I don't think that applies to the facts that were in the past. Events occurring before the act of aggression amendment comes into force will not be considered by the court.”
It seems that this whole world show around Crimea has completely different goals and they should be looked for in the Middle East.
For real catchphrase“And the casket simply opened” is one of the few that have not lost its original meaning - a task whose solution seemed very difficult, in fact turned out to be simple, not requiring much effort.
From what fable does the phrase “And the casket just open” come from?
It so happens that there are few people who love the literary genre of fables, be it works of domestic or foreign writers, but almost every child studies them at school, and he even learns some of them by heart, and, it would seem, should remember at least approximately what are they about, if the author doesn’t remember. However, he often doesn’t remember. A happy exception in this sense were the works of the Russian author I. A. Krylov. The fables about the fox and the crow, the monkey and glasses, and Demyanov’s ear were not only not forgotten, but also gave us a lot of popular expressions.
The fable “The Casket,” written in 1807, tells about a casket made by the Master with a secret, which the Sage tried unsuccessfully to unravel. The final line of this instructive story in verse is the phrase “And the casket simply opened.” Although not everyone will be able to recall the plot of the fable itself, a clear formulation of morality, without which a fable is not a fable, has firmly entered our lives and continues to be relevant even now.
One of the meanings put into this phraseological unit is also a call not to try to solve a simple problem in complex ways that can only aggravate it. The most consonant analogues of this expression can be considered the no less well-known phraseological phrase “break into open door” and the unforgettable “simplicity is enough for every wise man.”
The fable "Larchik" is one of the few original works famous poet I. A. Krylov, which have several interpretations at once. But before revealing each of them to you, we invite you to personally familiarize yourself with this fable.
Fable "Larchik"
It often happens to us
And work and wisdom to see there,
Where you just have to guess
Just get down to business.
A Casket was brought to someone from the master.
The decoration and cleanliness of the Casket caught my eye;
Well, everyone admired the beautiful Casket.
Here a sage enters the mechanics room.
Looking at the chest, he said:
“Casket with a secret,
So; it doesn't even have a lock;
And I undertake to open it; yes, yes, I'm sure of it;
Don't laugh so secretly!
I will find the secret and I will reveal the little chest to you:
In mechanics, I’m also worth something.”
So he set to work on the Casket:
Turns him from all sides
And he breaks his head;
First a carnation, then another, then a bracket.
Here, looking at him, another
Shakes his head;
They whisper, and they laugh among themselves.
The only thing that rings in my ears is:
“Not here, not like that, not there!”
The mechanic is even more eager.
Sweated, sweated; but finally got tired
I left Larchik behind
And I couldn’t figure out how to open it:
And the casket simply opened.
Moral of Krylov's fable "Larchik"
The moral of the fable “The Casket” is enclosed by the author in the first 4 lines and is that when solving a particular problem, there is no need to rush to “be smart”; first you should try simple and obvious options, because They are often the best (and sometimes the only) solution.
Analysis of the fable “Larchik”
The simple plot of the fable “The Casket”: “they brought to someone” an amazing handmade casket, and this casket did not have a lock, which made it even more mysterious, so a real sage took on revealing its “secret”, but only to he didn’t do anything with the box, he didn’t use any tools, he never managed to open it - it would seem that there was nothing instructive if not for the last line in which the author explains that the box “simply opened.”
It’s the same in life: very often people are looking for some complex solutions in situations where the way out of them “lies on the surface,” as in the case of fables. Krylov seems to be explaining to his reader that there is no need to look for secrets in his creations. deep meaning, it is obvious and almost always spelled out by the author.
At the same time, even in this work, some people invest additional meaning: since the poet never revealed to us the secret of how this mysterious casket was opened, it means that the story has two plot options.
- The casket really did not have a lock.
- There was still a lock, but the master simply did not find it.
Which one to choose, each reader decides for himself - there is no universal answer, as well as the only correct solution to any problem; each of them requires its own approach: in some cases it is complex, in others it is the simplest.
Winged expressions from the fable “Larchik”
“And the Casket simply opened” is used to characterize the problem in the fable “The Casket,” which, despite its apparent complexity, has a simple solution.
It often happens to us
And work and wisdom to see there,
Where you just have to guess
Just get down to business.
A Casket was brought to someone from the master.
The decoration and cleanliness of the Casket caught my eye;
Well, everyone admired the beautiful Casket.
Here a sage enters the mechanics room.
Looking at the Casket, he said: “A casket with a secret,
So; it doesn't even have a lock;
And I undertake to open it; yes, yes, I'm sure of it;
Don't laugh so secretly!
I will find the secret and I will reveal the little chest to you:
In mechanics, I’m also worth something.”
So he set to work on the Casket:
Turns him from all sides
And he breaks his head;
First a carnation, then another, then a bracket.
Here, looking at him, another
Shakes his head;
They whisper, and they laugh among themselves.
The only thing that rings in my ears is:
"Not here, not like that, not there!" The mechanic is even more eager.
Sweated, sweated; but finally got tired
I left Larchik behind
And I couldn’t figure out how to open it:
And the casket simply opened.
Moral of the fable "Larchik"
This fable is perhaps one of the most difficult in the work of the famous Krylov, and combines simplicity and secret at the same time. Read carefully the contents of the lines.
The simplest conclusion about its essence, like the “casket” itself, seems to be simple - before choosing a difficult path and inventing something, you should first try those methods that seem too obvious and simple - maybe this will be the solution to the problem.
But there is a second subtext to this story - after all, the casket was never opened. The question remains - was it really just without locks, or did the master lack the skill to unravel it?
“Larchik” is one of Krylov’s first original fables. Krylov's fable Chest tells the story of an experienced mechanic who tried unsuccessfully to open a casket. Despite the efforts of the master and the hints of the assembled spectators, the casket was never opened - it turned out that there was simply no lock in it.
Fable Chest read
It often happens to us
And work and wisdom to see there,
Where you just have to guess
Just get down to business.
A Casket was brought to someone from the master.
The decoration and cleanliness of the Casket caught my eye;
Well, everyone admired the beautiful Casket.
Here a sage enters the mechanics room.
Looking at the Casket, he said: “A casket with a secret,
So; it doesn't even have a lock;
And I undertake to open it; yes, yes, I'm sure of it;
Don't laugh so secretly!
I will find the secret and I will reveal the little chest to you:
In mechanics, I’m also worth something.”
So he set to work on the Casket:
Turns him from all sides
And he breaks his head;
First a carnation, then another, then a bracket.
Here, looking at him, another
Shakes his head;
They whisper, and they laugh among themselves.
The only thing that rings in my ears is:
"Not here, not like that, not there!" The mechanic is even more eager.
Sweated, sweated; but finally got tired
I left Larchik behind
And I couldn’t figure out how to open it:
And the casket simply opened.
Moral of the fable Larchik
It often happens to us
And work and wisdom to see there,
Where you just have to guess
Just get down to business.
Fable Larchik - analysis
“The Casket” is a landmark work for the great fabulist. The analysis of Krylov's fable Casket usually begins from the end, with the phrase “And the casket just opened.” With these words, Krylov says that you should not complicate the tasks too much without trying to solve them in the simplest way.
But in this context, the long efforts of an experienced master and the absurd hints of the public are also of considerable importance. This is the personification of attempts to understand Krylov himself. The writer claims that there is no need to carefully select the key to his fables - most often, it lies right on the surface!
There is another way to read this work. The writer never gave the reader a concrete understanding of how exactly the casket was opened? Another moral of Krylov’s fable Larchik follows from this - not a single problem has the only correct solution, each case requires a special approach. The reader must understand for himself whether the chest really did not have a lock, or whether the mechanic simply could not find it.
